Peer Review #2

 week 8, reading task

This week I took the time to read your post and leave a footback based on the SPARK method.

 While using this method helps me learn a few things from applying this method. First of all, I have a standard review of a few blogs.

The first is that each blog post needs to be simple to understand and generalize the content you want to write. We should write so that everyone can understand what you are talking about. The audience that needs to be addressed here are people who do not know anything about what they are talking about. Another important thing we have here is a clear and specific layout and presentation. This helps the reader not to feel confused and confused when reading the article.

Second, asking questions to the writer makes me more understanding. The questions we ask will be the knowledge we remember longer and understand better than any other. Asking questions for others and for yourself is a way to train your mind. A good and quality question for an author is also an extremely effective form of learning and training. This has been proven in practice, when the scientist Thomas Edison from a young age always asked interesting questions to his teachers, parents and himself.

  I've also found that the conclusion is usually pretty short, but it's also incredibly important. With the key words compiled from the whole article, the conclusion serves as a way to help me review what I have read as well as learned. Therefore, when writing a blog post, the keyword words repeated at the end of the article will help the content of the article stay in the minds of the readers.

In conclusion, the SPARK method helps me improve my writing, as we focus on developing ideas, clarity, and meaningful organization of the writer's text.